Alphachimp Studio > Pop!Tech > Human Nature > Panel Discussion
From David Weinberg's Blog:
Gladwell:
Not all the superpowers ar here yet. E.g., we can't know what evil lurks
in the hearts of men. [Also, no creepy stretchiness.]
Garreau: We're developing infallible lie detectors.
Gladwell: If I don't know if I'm telling a lie, how
can you know?
de Waal: The people in the fields you (Garreau) are
talking about don't know enough about primate behavior. Anger can be
beneficial. Alter that, for example, and who knows what you will screw
up?
Metcalfe: The guy who designed the Pepsi Challenge
is in our audience. Was Malcolm's characterization accurate?
Guy: Yeah, about 75%.
Malcolm: My point is that things are more complex than
these tests often think. E.g., people react to the packaging as if they're
reacting to the product. It's better to observe human behavior than
test it or ask for explicit explanations.
de Waal: I don't trust questionnaires at all. Observation!
de Waal: I get jittery about proposal to change human
nature because we know so little about it and everything is tied to
something else.
Metcalfe: Do you, Dr. de Waal, think that we should
behave more like chimps.
de Waal: [laughs] No, we're all unique. For example,
we have pair-bonding and families, which chimps don't. We should be
aware of our primate tendencies.
|